<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Intel and OLPC Separate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.alltogetherwecan.com/2008/01/06/intel-and-olpc-separate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.alltogetherwecan.com/2008/01/06/intel-and-olpc-separate/</link>
	<description>AAC, AT, Families, Inclusion, Literacy, UDL</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 15:42:32 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: alltogether</title>
		<link>http://www.alltogetherwecan.com/2008/01/06/intel-and-olpc-separate/comment-page-1/#comment-83</link>
		<dc:creator>alltogether</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alltogether.wordpress.com/2008/01/06/intel-and-olpc-separate/#comment-83</guid>
		<description>Paul,

Thanks.  Yes, let us hope that the project can be successful.  It seems as if Intel and a number of major computer companies have a great deal at stake.  True integrity with collaboration seems to be the key.

Yes, I am ready to chime in and look forward to the discussions.

Same to you for the new year!

-Sam</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul,</p>
<p>Thanks.  Yes, let us hope that the project can be successful.  It seems as if Intel and a number of major computer companies have a great deal at stake.  True integrity with collaboration seems to be the key.</p>
<p>Yes, I am ready to chime in and look forward to the discussions.</p>
<p>Same to you for the new year!</p>
<p>-Sam</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paulhami</title>
		<link>http://www.alltogetherwecan.com/2008/01/06/intel-and-olpc-separate/comment-page-1/#comment-84</link>
		<dc:creator>paulhami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:01:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alltogether.wordpress.com/2008/01/06/intel-and-olpc-separate/#comment-84</guid>
		<description>Hi Charles.  Let&#039;s hope the project continues successfully without Intel&#039;s participation.  It would be great to hear your observations about the XO.  Can we look forward to a blog post about that in the not too distant future?

All the best in 2008!

--Paul</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Charles.  Let&#8217;s hope the project continues successfully without Intel&#8217;s participation.  It would be great to hear your observations about the XO.  Can we look forward to a blog post about that in the not too distant future?</p>
<p>All the best in 2008!</p>
<p>&#8211;Paul</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ray Zed Blog &#187; Intel and OLPC Separate</title>
		<link>http://www.alltogetherwecan.com/2008/01/06/intel-and-olpc-separate/comment-page-1/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Ray Zed Blog &#187; Intel and OLPC Separate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:21:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alltogether.wordpress.com/2008/01/06/intel-and-olpc-separate/#comment-85</guid>
		<description>[...] Christoph Derndorfer: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Christoph Derndorfer: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
